EPPPL 4/2019 (Vol. 14)

Editorial

Christopher Bovis

Seite 209 - 213

Special Issue on the Legal Remedies and Implications from the Fosen-Linjen Case ∙ Damages in EU Public Procurement Law:

Fosen-Linjen Can Hardly Be the Last Chapter

Roberto Caranta

Seite 214 - 221

Special Issue on the Legal Remedies and Implications from the Fosen-Linjen Case ∙ Procurement Damages in the UK and France – Why So Different?

Revisiting the Issue in Light of the Fosen-Linjen Saga

Roxana Vornicu

Seite 222 - 229

Special Issue on the Legal Remedies and Implications from the Fosen-Linjen Case ∙ The Fosen-Linjen Saga ­– A Norwegian Perspective

Dag Sørlie Lund

Seite 230 - 240

Special Issue on the Legal Remedies and Implications from the Fosen-Linjen Case ∙ The Fosen-Linjen Saga from an EEA Law Perspective

Halvard Haukeland Fredriksen

Seite 241 - 247

Special Issue on the Legal Remedies and Implications from the Fosen-Linjen Case ∙ The EFTA Court’s Fosen-Linjen Saga on Procurement Damages:

A There and Back Again Walk

Albert Sanchez-Graells

Seite 248 - 254

Special Issue on the Legal Remedies and Implications from the Fosen-Linjen Case ∙ Damages in Public Procurement Law: A Right or a Privilege?

Some Thoughts After the Fosen-Linjen Saga

Miguel Assis Raimundo

Seite 255 - 261

In-House Procurement – The Discretion of Member States Confirmed, the Relationship with Competition Law Remains Open

Case C-285/18 Irgita, Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (4th Chamber) of 3 October 2019

Wojciech Hartung

Seite 262 - 267